LEGISLATION HAS BEEN INTRODUCED IN THE U-S CONGRESS TO OUTLAW HUMAN CLONING AND DENY GOVERNMENT FUNDING FOR RESEARCH ON IT. THE MEASURES ARE A REACTION TO THE RECENT REPORT OF THE CLONING OF AN ADULT SHEEP IN SCOTLAND, A MOVE MANY FEAR COULD BE EVENTUALLY DUPLICATED IN PEOPLE BUT, SCIENTISTS ARE SKEPTICAL THAT LEGISLATION WOULD BLOCK THE BENEFITS CLONING COULD OFFER UNLESS IT IS CAREFULLY WRITTEN.06-Mar-97UNLIKE BRITAIN, GERMANY, AND SOME OTHER COUNTRIES, THE UNITED STATES HAS NO LAW FORBIDDING HUMAN CLONING, THE THEORETICAL PROCESS OF MAKING AN EXACT DUPLICATE OF A PERSON. BUT THE SCOTTISH SHEEP CLONING EXPERIMENT HAS STARTLED POLITICAL LEADERS INTO IMPOSING RESTRICTIONS BEFORE THE TECHNOLOGY BECOMES POSSIBLE IN HUMANS.
THE CONGRESSWOMAN WHO CHAIRS A U-S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SUBCOMMITTEE ON TECHNOLOGY -- REPUBLICAN CONNIE MORELLA OF MARYLAND -- EXPRESSED HER REPUGNANCE OVER THE IDEA, AT A RECENT HEARING ON THE TOPIC.
I CERTAINLY AM CONCERNED ABOUT HUMAN CLONING. I THINK WE ALL ARE. THERE ARE VERY COMPELLING MORAL, RELIGIOUS, AND PSYCHOLOGICAL REASONS NOT TO PERMIT IT. THE THEORETICAL CLONING OF HUMAN EMBRYOS HAS CERTAINLY RAISED STRONG CONCERNS AND OBJECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS CURRENTLY OPERATING WITH A SCATTERED SET OF GUIDELINES BANNING THE FUNDING OF HUMAN EMBRYO AND HUMAN CLONING STUDIES BY THE GOVERNMENT'S MEDICAL RESEARCH AGENCY, THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH. SOME ARE IN THE FORM OF DIRECTIVES FROM PRESIDENT CLINTON, WHILE OTHERS HAVE COME AS AMENDMENTS TO LAWS FUNDING THE AGENCY.
BUT THERE IS NO BAN AGAINST HUMAN CLONING RESEARCH ITSELF OR AGAINST PRIVATE MONEY FROM PAYING FOR IT, ALTHOUGH MR. CLINTON HAS ASKED FOR A VOLUNTARY, TEMPORARY MORATORIUM. HE WANTS TO POSTPONE SUCH WORK WHILE HIS BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION COMES UP WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ON WHAT OTHER STEPS THE GOVERNMENT CAN TAKE TO ENSURE HUMANS ARE NEVER CLONED.
SCIENCE OFTEN MOVES FASTER THAN OUR ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND ITS IMPLICATIONS. THAT IS WHY WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO MOVE WITH CAUTION AND CARE TO HARNESS THE POWERFUL FORCES OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SO THAT WE CAN REAP THE BENEFIT WHILE MINIMIZING THE POTENTIAL DANGER.
BUT U-S LAWMAKERS ARE NOT WAITING FOR THE ADVISORY COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS, DESPITE MR. CLINTON'S DESIRE NOT TO ACT UNTIL THE PANEL HAS ITS SAY. MEASURES HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED IN BOTH THE U-S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE BANNING HUMAN CLONING RESEARCH.
THE SPONSOR OF THE HOUSE LEGISLATION -- REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN VERNON EHLERS ['AY-LERZ] OF MICHIGAN -- SAYS HE IS PROPOSING IT TO PREVENT A PUBLIC OUTCRY AGAINST ANY CLONING STUDIES, WHICH HE, HIS CONGRESSIONAL COLLEAGUES AND PRESIDENT CLINTON ADMIT HAVE SCIENTIFIC MERIT FOR MEDICINE, AGRICULTURE, AND OTHER FIELDS.
I THINK IF WE DON'T BAN IMMEDIATELY RESEARCH ON CLONING OF HUMANS, WE ARE LIKELY TO SEE A STRONG MOVEMENT TO BAN RESEARCH ON CLONING IN GENERAL. I THINK THAT'S WHY IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO DELINEATE THE LIMITS IMMEDIATELY ON HUMAN CLONING SO THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO CONTINUE FURTHER WORK IN THIS ISSUE OF CLONING OF OTHER SPECIES AND SIMPLY POINT OUT TO THE PUBLIC WE NOW HAVE A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC.
BUT THE HEAD OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH -- DR. HAROLD VARMUS -- IS ASKING THE LEGISLATORS TO BE CAREFUL HOW THEY WRITE THE LAW. DESPITE THE GENERAL OPPOSITION THEY AND PRESIDENT CLINTON HAVE EXPRESSED TO HUMAN CLONING, HE POINTED OUT IN THE RECENT HEARING THAT THERE ARE TIMES WHEN IT MAY BE DESIRABLE.
TO MAKE HUMAN CLONES FOR SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES TO ME IS AN OFFENSIVE IDEA. THERE IS, HOWEVER, THE ISSUE OF CREATING HUMAN CLONES TO COMBAT REPRODUCTIVE DEFICIENCIES. WE PRIZE OURSELVES AS HUMAN BEINGS BECAUSE OF OUR DIVERSITY, AND DIVERSITY IS THE PRODUCT OF THE MATING OF SPERM AND EGG. BUT I THINK WE NEED TO CONTEMPLATE WHETHER THERE MIGHT BE ANY RARE SITUATIONS IN WHICH IT MIGHT INDEED BE ACCEPTABLE TO CONTEMPLATE HUMAN CLONING UNDER STRICT CONDITIONS OF GUIDANCE.
AS DR. VARMUS PUT IT, BANNING INVESTIGATION OF AN UNWANTED GOAL COULD ALSO CUT OFF OFF RESEARCH INTO A DESIRABLE GOAL.
OTHERS ARE EXPECTED TO EXPRESS A SIMILAR VIEW WHEN THE PRESIDENT'S BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETS LATER THIS MONTH (MARCH 13TH AND 14TH) TO HEAR THE VIEWS OF SCIENTISTS, RELIGIOUS LEADERS, AND OTHER U-S OPINION MAKERS. THE PANEL IS TO REPORT ITS RECOMMENDATIONS TO PRESIDENT CLINTON BY THE END OF MAY.